Persuasion 12/6

     In class, we were discussing ways to describe Anne as a character. Though I do agree with such words as strategist, manipulator, etc., the idea I had during my reading for Anne was a peace maker. She was constantly looking out for what kept the world of everyone around her turning: keeping silent as to not start more trouble and coming up with solutions in hectic situations while others floundered about. There is a change in her as a character between volumes 1 & 2, I believe; Coming across as reserved in the beginning, Anne seems much more open by the end the novel. An example of this idea comes from her discussing with Captain Harville over men and women. A memorable line from her goes to say, "All the privilege I claim for my own sex is that of loving longest, when existence or when hope is gone," (pg. 244). Not only does this feel like a more bold Anne Elliot, This could also be Austen sharing her stance on the views between the two sexes. 

    Another aspect that I was intrigued in was what felt like different types of persuasion through the book. Looking at how Sir Walter was persuaded through vanity, Anne through duty, even Mr. Smith was persuaded to spend his money which ended him in debt. Austen is clever at showing the different means of persuasion and the negative and positive effects it possesses. Since most of the major characters are using or subjected to this tool of manipulation, it feels almost like an actual character itself. So it is understandable why it is the title of Austen's last novel. 

    Other discussions have addressed the notion of love vs. society and what take Austen has on the issue. I find that Austen thinks highly of a loving relationship and turns away from society standards. It feels that she makes this statement through the discussion with Anne and Henrietta. Even though Charles Hayter is not up to the standards Miss Musgrove's family may desire, they accept the marriage for he makes Henrietta happy which is enough for them (pg. 229-230). Austen makes it clear that this is how it should be. Love should dictate who marries who, not social status and wealth.